Archive for October 2010

Lies of a MOAC

Lies of a MOAC
Allegations and Lies About David Myatt Exposed

Background

Over the past two decades a number of individuals have developed a hatred of and an obsession with David Myatt to the extent that they have persistently spread rumors about him and made various accusations against him.

One such individual was a young Zionist who deigned to call himself, among others things, Omnipitus, and who literally spent years trying to defame Myatt. One of his many allegations was that Myatt never really converted to Islam, and was still a neo-nazi. The nemesis of this Zionist came when, in August of 2006, he decided to post his accusations about Myatt on the Islamic Awakening forum –

http://forums.islamicawakening.com/f20/omnipitus2006s-obsession-ibn-myatt-1838/

This led to a somewhat spirited debate with various Muslims, and with contributions from Myatt himself. In respect of the accusation that Myatt wasn’t a real Muslim, the most succinct reply, from a Muslim, was the following:

” ibn myatt is a MUSLIM and omnipitus2006 is a KAAFIR. That much is evident!”

Faced with such replies, the Zionist ran away, never to be heard from again. Perhaps this had something to do with some Muslims – enraged by some comments the Zionist made about Islam, and the Prophet, Muhammad – tracking him down to his home in Canada.

Another such Myatt hating individual was Gerry Gable, who (and without any evidence) in the 1980′s informed on Myatt to the Police, fingering him for a murder. Gable then, in the 1990′s – with his influential friend Micheal Whine – made a complaint about Myatt to the Metropolitan Police, alleging, among other things, that Myatt had incited murder. On both occasions, Myatt was interviewed by British Detectives, and on the latter occasion, was arrested and became the subject of an international investigation, lasting three years, involving the FBI, Interpol, and the Canadian Police. On both occasions, the matter was dropped because there was no evidence, just malicious allegations.

Gable also published, in a magazine he owned, many articles about Myatt in which he made various allegations about Myatt (such as Myatt was a Satanist) without ever once providing any evidence. In addition, for some years following Myatt’s conversion to Islam, Gable told anyone who would listen that in his opinion Myatt’s conversion was fake and Myatt was still a neo-nazi and also a Satanist.

However, in fairness, it should be stated that Gable has – since 2003 – made no comments about Myatt, and seems to have finally accepted that Myatt’s conversion to Islam was genuine.

Another such Myatt hating individual was, and is, Tom Raspotnik (aka the Rev Nev Blackwood) who grandiloquently described himself as the “the world leader of theistic Satanism”. Raspotnik also spent years ranting about Myatt, and even went so far as to offer a USD $10,000 reward for information regarding Myatt’s whereabouts. In addition, he claimed – for several years – to have a letter from Myatt, the publication of which, he asserted, would “destroy Myatt’s credibility”. Yet, despite being repeatedly asked, he has never dared to published this fictitious letter.

However, since the on-line publication of Raspotnik’s home address by some Satanists Raspotnik had publicly insulted, Raspotnik seems, for the moment at least, to have lost interest in Myatt, although it appears that he recently (October 2010 CE) offered another USD $10,000 reward for information regarding the whereabouts of another Myatt-hating stalker (the MOAC – see below) whom he seemed eager to contact and join forces with, perhaps to form some sort of world-wide anti-Myatt pinky alliance.

Another Myatt hating individual was, and is, the anonymous stalker nicknamed the MOAC – the Myatt Obsessed Anonymous Coward – who has spent the last three years anonymously posting literally hundreds of rabid rants about Myatt on diverse Internet forums and message boards, setting up dozens of anti-Myatt blogs, and repeating various malicious allegations about Myatt.

Some MOAC posts are archived at –

http://madmagemyatt.wordpress.com/myatt-stalker-archive/


MOAC Lies and Allegations

Since this MOAC, using a variety of usernames, re-posts his accusations every couple of months – even though all his accusations have been disproved, many times – it seems apposite to collect here the various allegations and lies, and their rebuttals, of this particular MOAC, and which collection of lies and their exposure can serve as a useful archive for future reference.

What is of especial interest about the MOAC is that he has never dared – despite being repeatedly asked – to make his accusations on the Islamic Awakening forum, where his accusations would face serious scrutiny from Muslims and even from Myatt himself. Instead, the MOAC prefers to make anonymous posts on various Internet forums, making the same accusations month after month, and year after year.

MOAC Lie – David Myatt is not and never has been a Muslim

Response: This is just your own untenable and biased person opinion, which you never ever dare post on the Islamic Awakening forum where Myatt is a member and where Myatt’s Muslim friends can tell you what they think of your opinion.

Why have you never dared to voice this view of yours on the IA forum? Because you know your view will be exposed for the lie it is.

For Myatt is accepted as a Muslim by Muslims – and also by well known people such as Professor Robert S. Wistrich (one of the world’s leading authorities on anti-Semitism) and by writers such as Martin Amis.

Furthermore, Myatt issued, over ten years ago, a copy of his Testimony of Faith in Islam, signed by two respectable Muslim witnesses from his local Mosque, and verified by the Islamic Foundation.

So, your claim is quite laughable… Especially given the following reply on the IA forum to a similar allegations made some years ago now: “ibn myatt is a MUSLIM and omnipitus2006 is a KAAFIR. That much is evident!”

MOAC Lie – David Myatt ‘Anton Long’ Is A Police Informer

Response: And your evidence for this malicious anonymous allegation is what – exactly?

You have no evidence. You never post any evidence – you just make malicious accusations, which you repeat time after time (the despicable cowardly Magian Big Lie Technique) in the hope that the sheeple, or some sheeple, will believe such accusations.

It is interesting that you’ve never, in over three years of posting rants about Myatt, answered the following simple question – Is or was Myatt a covert MI5 operative – yes, or no?

Why have you never answered this simple question?

MOAC Lie – David Myatt is a confirmed Satanist

Response: And your evidence for this malicious anonymous allegation is what – exactly?

Again, you have no evidence. Only hearsay, rumor, and a desire to believe such things. There is no actual evidence that Myatt is, or was, a Satanist. No one has ever produced any such evidence, in over three decades.

No, wait – you previously stated you have statements made by two University students – students, note, not academics – who wrote essays in which they repeated such hearsay and rumors.

No, wait – you also have statements made by a few others who state that, in their personal opinion, Myatt is a Satanist. Great stuff – keep it going, for even if you have a million such personal statements, they would be irrelevant. That you cannot comprehend this simple fact, reveals your mundane character and your personal prejudice.

No, wait – you also claimed that because Myatt’s name appeared as co-author on a few books published in the 1980’s by some obscure publisher (who produced only around a dozen copies anyways of said books) it must mean that he’s a Satanist, even though you have no proof that the publisher did not use his name in vain.

It seems you also somehow forgot that Myatt, in the 1980’s and for a few years, ran a honey-trap operation, based on an Occult group, for the purposes of “infiltrating certain individuals into various positions in society”, and of “obtaining confidential information”, and for other nefarious spooky purposes. Given that Myatt was trained – as a member of Column 88 – in subversion, infiltration, assassination, sabotage, and other such stuff, and given that Column 88 was part of NATO’s clandestine Gladio stay-behind network, this gives a rather different “spin” on such limited Occult involvement in the 80’s, and leads us to ask (yet again) the question you have never answered, which question is: Do you believe that David Myatt is, or was, a covert MI5 operative, Yes, or No?

Why have you never – in your hundreds of posts or on any of our dozen or so blogs – answered this one simple question about Myatt?

MOAC Lie – This thread has caused David Myatt a considerable amount of embarrassment.

Response: Au contraire! All your Myatt posts serve only to do three things. (1) Create more interest in the life and works of David Myatt. (2) Create more interest in the Order of Nine Angles, and add to the sinister mystique of the ONA. (3) Reveal you for the obsessive, and disturbed, Myatt-hater that you are.

Do you seriously believe that Myatt – “the staunch advocate of Jihad, suicide missions, killing Jews, and an ardent defender of bin Laden” – is bothered by what one dirty kaffir says or writes? Or even what a hundred or a thousand dirty kuffar say or write? If you do believe he’s bothered, then you are even more deluded than I give you credit for. I imagine that Myatt just laughs, and says something like the following Al-Qaeda du’a:

اللهُمَّ أَحْصِهِمْ عَدَداً، وَاقْتُلْهُمْ بَدَداً، وَلا تُغَادِرْ مِنْهُمْ أَحَداً، وَاجْعَلْهُمْ

عِبْرَةً لأَمْثَالِهِمْ مِنَ اليَهُودِ وَالنَّصَارى وَالمُشْرِكِينَ، أَذِلَّةً صَاغِرِينَ


MOAC Lie
– Anton Long, has hacked BBC Ouch Forum accounts and is stealing data from disabled people. He then arranges for the victims to be attacked by local yobs.

Response: And your evidence for Anton Long hacking such forum is what – exactly? You have never ever given any evidence at all. You just make malicious accusations, which you repeat time after time (the despicable cowardly Magian Big Lie Technique) in the hope that the sheeple, or some sheeple (aka mundanes), will believe such accusations.

And your evidence for Anton Long (or anyone) stealing data is what – exactly? Yet again, you have never ever give any evidence at all. You just blandly make the allegation. Anonymously, of course.

MOAC Lie – BN Village is a fake Afro-Caribbean message board, used for ID theft. Set up / hi-jacked, by Neo – Nazi, David Myatt

Response: And your evidence for such accusations is what – exactly? Yet again, you have never ever given any evidence at all.

We are just supposed to “take your word” for it, I guess 🙂

MOAC Lie – Black British Forums ( blackpresence ) is another phony message board run by neo-Nazi Anton Long for the purposes of data theft

Response: And your evidence for such accusations is what – exactly? Yet again, you have never ever given any evidence at all.

If we are to believe your many similar accusations, Anton Long is master computer cracker (note: it’s, correctly, cracker, not “hacker”) – who surely should be accorded celebritycracker status.

Since you’ve also claimed “he’s hacked your computer”, we have to wonder why he hasn’t sent “local yobs” (or neo-nazi thugs) after you and “intimated you” or otherwise dealt with you (and here, culling comes to mind), which he would surely do were he as vicious and evil as you claim and were he to have, as you claim, bands of local yobs at his beck and call. Or could it be – could it just be – that your claims are just fantasy?

Even if he hadn’t – yet – cracked your computer – if he was as skilled in computer cracking as you claim then he would surely, by now, after all these years have tracked you down…

But perhaps he does, after all, know who you are and where you are and is just playing games with you since you, by your obession with him, create more interest in him and his works and thus are useful propaganda, a useful mundane (or kaffir) who currently serves his fiendish plan.

MOAC Lie – Do not click on any of “Raffy’s” links. They all lead to sites used for I.D. theft. I’ve had my computer attacked frequently when browsing the ‘David Myatt’ hate sites

Response:
(1) Yet again, you give no evidence at all for such ID theft. How did you know it was ID theft? Did you have some anti-virus/anti-hacking software installed? if so, what? Give excerpts from your logs. Give the URL’s of the links you claim led to such theft. And so on. You never give any details – which leads us to believe it’s just another of your malicious, anonymous, allegations.

(2) What are the URL’s of these so-called “hate sites”?  Why are they “hate sites”? Given examples of why they are “hate-sites”. You never ever give such details – which leads us to believe these are just more of your malicious, anonymous, allegations.

(3) Why have you never reported these alleged ID theft’s to the Police? Is it because they’re all in your mind?



MOAC Lie – The ‘ David Myatt ‘ hate-site has clearly demonstrated its involvement in the Kerri Delacruz assault.

Response:
(1) What is the URL of this so-called hate-site? You never give a URL. Why not?

(2) Why is this unknown site a “hate site”? Given examples of why it is a “hate-site”. You never ever give such details – which leads us to believe these are just more of your malicious, anonymous, allegations.

(3) What is the evidence linking this so-called (unknown) hate-site to Kerri Delacruz? You have never given any link – no evidence at at all.

(4) Why have you not reported your allegations to the Police? Which leads us to believe these are just more of your malicious, anonymous, allegations.

(5) You once, years ago, claimed that you had reported your suspicions about the Kerri Delacruz assault to the Police. You were then asked for a PIN (Police Incident Number) – which you could not supply. Instead, you made the feeble excuse that “the Police weren’t interested” in your suspicions, which – as any serving British Police officer or lawyer will tell you – is a ridiculous statement, since they take such assaults on or harassment of such people very seriously.

That you made such a ridiculous (and indeed contemptible) statement surely proves that your anonymous allegations are just malicious allegations.

(6) That you have publicly – and anonymously (as always) – used a known case of assault on a disabled person to further your anti-Myatt agenda is totally contemptible, and reveals your true nature. In fact, the Police should be investigating you for such contemptible behaviour and for your harassment of Myatt. Perhaps they are, and one day you’ll have to answer for your years of stalking and your malicious allegations.

MOAC Lie – ‘Anton Long ‘ is a Satanist, a nazi with a history of violence and organizes gangstalking which targets vulnerable disabled people. He organized attacks on a disabled woman suffering from cancer

Response:

(1) Gangstalking? And your evidence for such allegations are what – exactly? You have never presented any evidence at all.

(2) Targets vulnerable disabled people? And your evidence for such allegations are what – exactly? You have never presented any evidence at all.

(3) He organized attacks on a disabled woman suffering from cancer? Give dates, details, evidence. You have never presented any details or any evidence at all.

In summary, these are just more anonymously made allegations which you repeat time after time (the despicable cowardly Magian Big Lie Technique) in the hope that the sheeple, or some sheeple, will believe such accusations.

MOAC Lie – David Myatt kicked out of Combat18 after allegations that Satanists were using the organization as a front for child molestation

Response: And your source for this malicious allegations is what, exactly? You don’t give one!

No, wait – you once in another of your rabid posts about Myatt, a few years ago now (2007), gave the source as a 1997 issue of a tatty little photocopied zine produced by a nazi bonehead and called Redwatch, which tatty little photocopy blandly stated that “Satanists are dirty scum who use this bullshit as a front for child molestation…” At the time of the article, Myatt was heavily involved in Combat 18, and remained so for over a year. Indeed, according to Professor George Michael, Myatt took over the leadership of Combat 18 the following year when Charlie Sargent, the previous leader, was jailed for murder.

So, your assertion is just a lie. Myatt was never “kicked out of Combat 18” as you claim – instead, he remained a member and even took the organization over, and only left when he converted to Islam in September 1998.

That you quote some scrawling by some nazi bonehead in some photocopied smear-sheet is interesting and shows the true worth of your so-called “sources of information” about Myatt.

MOAC Lie – Reams of evidence that Myatt has lied about his non-involvement with Satanism are given in the links below..

Response: Your links lead to items where people give their personal opinions about Myatt. Quoting the opinions of others about a person is not evidence. That you believe it is, shows your desperation and lack of reasoning.

Even the notorious Searchlight article about Myatt, in April 1998 – which you love to quote from – contains just speculation and the personal opinion of the author. No evidence is ever given for any of the allegations made. For instance, the allegation that Myatt is Long; for instance, the allegation that Myatt was friends with Vik Norris. Just blandly stating that “they were friends” without producing any evidence is just using smear tactics.

I might as well claim that you – the MOAC – are friends with notorious paedophiles and rapists, and are desperate to try and keep your identity secret in case your criminal past and psychiatric history come out.

Anyways, no one in C18 took those Searchlight allegations seriously – they were laughed at, and were considered just more Zionist propaganda and disinformation. One C18 member even quoted that famous line from Hitler, that it’s an honor to find yourself smeared by your Jewish enemies, and that if you wake up in the morning and don’t find yourself smeared in the Jewish media then you hadn’t made good use of the previous day!

MOAC Lie – [Evidence ] including two recent academic studies from Scandinavia and New Zealand,

Response: They are not academic studies – they’re essays by students at Uni submitted for dissertations, and contain no evidence, only assumptions and the repetition of allegations that others have made.

By all means post the so-called *evidence* from these essays which you believe back-up your own allegations.

By the way, the *textual evidence* that Senholt claims backs up his assumption that Myatt is Long is so un-academic as to be laughable. It’s not based, for instance, on any forensic documentation analysis of contested documents, or on any accepted literary forensic technique, but instead is just Senholt’s personal opinion based on his own reading of certain texts.

That you seem to believe that it is more that just someone’s opinion, yet again shows your lack of reasoning and your reliance on dubious sources and your silly use of the appeal to authority logical fallacy.

I repeat – in over thirty years no one has ever produced any evidence for either Myatt being a Satanist, or for Myatt being Anton Long. All we have are smears, rumors, and allegations.

MOAC Lie – Interviewed by police and the RSPCA on charges of animal cruelty. Myatt’s notorious cat strangling incident.

Response: Myatt was indeed interviewed by the Police and the RSPCA in 1974, but about an allegation someone made against him. What you fail to mention is that both the Police and the RSPCA concluded that the allegation was pure journalistic invention, a smear designed to discredit Myatt, who at the time was heavily-involved in the notoriously violent neo-nazi group, the NDFM, and who had, the previous year, been released from prison after serving a prison sentence for violence.

MOAC Lie – David Myatt kicked out of another nazi group by leader Eddie Morrison,

Response: That you resort to quoting some piece written in some rag – in this case written by the notorious drunkard Morrison, whom John Tyndall described as:

“a specimen who has constantly ratted on everyone who has posed trust in him, and always in an atmosphere of shady plotting and intrigue.”

Strange that you rely on the opinions of such people. The quote, BTW, is from Tyndall’s Spearhead mag April 1983, which was titled The Wanderings and Posturings of the Pathetic Eddy Morrison.

BTW, Myatt published his own recollection of this Morrison story in both his Autobiographical Notes (first published in 2003) and his autobiography, Myngath (2010).

MOAC Lie – Myatt is a weak little coward

Response: That you make this accusation anonymously is very interesting. Here are some some verified facts about Myatt’s life, mostly taken from the Wikipedia article about Myatt:

^ acted as Jordan’s bodyguard at meetings and rallies
^ imprisoned twice for violent offenses in connection with his political activism
^ recruited and trained by the clandestine NATO stay-behind paramilitary group Column 88
^ was the founder and first leader of the National Socialist Movement of which David Copeland was a member
^ founded the neo-nazi organization the NDFM in Leeds in the 1970′s which was known for its violence
^ took over the leadership of Combat 18 in 1998, when Charlie Sargent, the previous leader, was jailed for murder
^ arrested by the elite Police unit SO12 of Scotland Yard on suspicion of conspiracy to murder
^ called – by one of the most eminent world authorities on anti-Semitism – a staunch advocate of “Jihad, suicide missions and killing Jews… and an ardent defender of bin Laden”

Now, that’s certainly an active, violent, and interesting, life – which includes several leadership positions of violent groups, and which life is redolent of his real character. Myatt has even challenged several individuals to a duel with deadly weapons, and been involved in numerous violent street fights and confrontations. He has studied and trained in the martial arts, and several of his detractors (for example, journalist Nick Ryan) have described him as amartial arts expert.

In contrast, who are you? What have you done?

It seems that you’re just jealous, and that it’s you who is the weak little coward since all you seem to do is anonymously post allegations about someone on the Internet and don’t even have the balls to post on the Islamic Awakening forum.

^^^
 

The Green Damask Room

David Myatt, from a painting by Richard Moult

 

Personal Conclusion:
Prejudice and Personal Knowing
– Myatt as Archetype


Despite his reclusive nature, and his conversion to Islam, David Myatt still often evokes a certain mystique. For instance, the following recent (September 2010 CE) quote – from an Internet forum devoted, of all things, to outré modern music – is rather typical,

David Myatt who started the actual O9A… is doing something light years away from culling and Lucifer. As someone once said: “The ONA has taught the most efficient way to curse someone. You send them a nailbomb.”

The following comments about Myatt are also typical,

” Myatt is a staunch advocate of Jihad, suicide missions and killing Jews… and also an ardent defender of bin Laden.”  Professor Robert S. Wistrich

“I genuinely like Myatt. I see him in the same mold as Manson: a prophet of the Kali Yuga; a nihilistic visionary – but with a grander vision than Manson’s, and far more ruthless, fanatical and determined to see it come to fruition.”

” Myatt may seem to have flitted from one politico-religious philosophy to another, but there is a terrible thread of continuity and rigour through his life and writings that suggests he is much more than a disingenuous provocateur. Naziism and Islamicism have served, in turn, as modalities of disruption for what remains at core an occult working to sow general chaos and division – the necessary passage of “Helter Skelter” to break down the Old Order, before the founding of the New.

So again: whose interests are served by there being a David Myatt? Is he is own man – or men – or does he belong to someone else? Or is it something else – an intelligence service perhaps? ” Jeff Wells – Nine Angles of Separation (Aug 2005)

” People still think of, talk about, and follow David Myatt… even if he was a Nazi Thug… even if he was a Muslim… Even if he denies being a Satanist publicly. There are still thousands that know Myatt, thousands that look up to him, in whose minds he is a fixture…Aquino is nobody today but people still fear Myatt. It’s been some 30-40 years, and David Myatt still reigns the Sinister.” Chloe, WSA352 (California, USA)

Perhaps it is this mystique that so infuriates the many Myatt-haters and propels them, perhaps sometime unconsciously, to rant about Myatt as they do, desirous as they seem to be (perhaps out of mundane jealousy) of trying to “cut Myatt down to size”. Perhaps their attempts to do so make them feel better about themselves.

However, and importantly, two common features among the Myatt-haters are that they don’t know Myatt personally, and so judge him based on the opinions of others, and that they never bother to read or study the vast corpus of Myatt’s works but instead concentrate on one or two things they’ve heard about Myatt, or one or two of his writings, however old, that they may have read.

Thus, they have a very one-sided, and prejudiced, view of Myatt. For instance, Gable, in all his many articles and comments about Myatt, over more than twenty years, never once mentioned Myatt’s poetry, or his Greek translations, or his Numinous Way philosophy or his published private letters. Ditto with the MOAC. Raspotnik has also never mentioned Myatt’s poetry or his Greek translations, or Myatt’s autobiography, or Myatt’s published personal letters.

In the case of Gable, he concentrated on Myatt the Nazi and Myatt the alleged Occultist. In the case of the MOAC, he concentrates on Myatt the alleged mentor of Copeland and Myatt as alleged Satanist. In the case of Raspotnik, he concentrates – to be point of obsession – on Myatt’s Islamic writings, on Myatt the Terrorist.

In all cases, something Myatt writes, or has written, or something he has alleged to have done, sparks hatred and outrage in these people – and they concentrate on such words, or such alleged deeds, to the prejudiced exclusion of everything else.

That is, they become emotionally driven by an almost pathological hatred of Myatt – so much so, that he becomes, for them, an embodiment of evil; evil made flesh. An evil genius; the most evil Nazi in Britain; a poisonous despicable person; a terrorist who doesn’t deserve to live; a vile Messiah… Such are some of their epithets.

Then, after a while of casting Myatt in the role of The Devil, something curious and psychologically interesting seems to happen to most of the Myatt-haters. It happened to Gable; it happened to the MOAC, and now it’s happened to Raspotnik.

They turn from describing Myatt as “a dangerous man”, “a fiend” (and so on) to trying to belittle him, and claiming he has “no influence”, and “is of no importance”, and “is an insignificant little man” – or, even, in the case of the MOAC is “a shambling Fagin figure wearing dirty clothes.”  Often, they also boast about their own prowess, and that they’re not “afraid of Myatt” who “is a coward”, or whatever.

Yet, despite such claims, they continue to want, even demand, the authorities to deal with Myatt, and jail him, as they continue to spew forth their vitriolic hatred of Myatt. Thus, we have the MOAC claiming that Myatt is “unimportant and uninteresting” and yet continuing to post dozens of posts about him, and continuing to set up new blogs about Myatt every time one of his anti-Myatt blogs gets shut down for posting malicious libellous allegations. Thus we have Gable and Whine claiming Myatt is “of no importance” and yet pleading for Muslims to have “nothing to do with this man.”

Thus, we have Raspotnik claiming he knows all about Myatt, and even has his address, and yet offers a reward of USD $10,000 to anyone who can tell him where Myatt is, as we have Raspotnik claiming that Myatt is “a fake” – although a fake of what is never explained – and that’s he’s “not afraid of Myatt” and will “take him one, anyday” even though he still wants the authorities to jail Myatt.

Why this change in their attitude? Why this sudden need to try, in their own minds, to belittle Myatt?

Most certainly because it comforts them, massages their ego, and gives them the illusion of importance and personal power.

So, it seems to work like this. First, they hate then demonize Myatt. But after a while that makes them feel rather insecure, uncomfortable, afraid, and powerless. So, in their fantasy, they cast themselves in the role of the brave Knight, righter-of-wrongs, who can take on and defeat The Black Knight because really their adversary is a coward, a Fagin, whom they – in their shining armor – can expose and defeat. It’s as if they’re in some Hollywood movie – or they’ve identified with some character in some video game who has embarked on a noble quest to vanquish the dastardly enemies of the good citizens of Earth…

Therefore, it does seem as if Myatt is serving a useful sinister, archetypal, purpose for such broken or immature or prejudiced or hate-filled people, just as this itself may hint at a deeper esoteric truth.

Which is that Myatt seems to have become – or is becoming – something of an archetype, sinister and otherwise. A real living archetype that certain people can identify with, and which certain other people can hate and use to indulge their fantasies and which makes them feel better about themselves. Perhaps certain other people may even find in Myatt – The Compleat Myatt, composed of Mystic Myatt (The Numinous Way, Poetry), The Mad Mage (the ONA), and The Fanatic Warrior (Reichsfolk and Jihadi Islam) – a means to achieve a certain natural balance of opposites within themselves.

Thus, it may well be that people such as Raspotnik and The MOAC are merely signs – pointers to this emerging esoteric truth of Myatt as Archetype.

Not only that, but by their unconscious actions they give life to this new, this emerging, archetype.  Myatt alive seems thus to becoming more and more influential in so many and different ways, an influence that will surely only increase when Myatt himself is dead, or disappears from mortal view.

SinisterMoon
October 2010 CE
121 Year of Fayen

 

A pdf version of the above article (235 Kb) available here.

 


 

Advertisements

Myatt and the Order of Nine Angles

Editorial Note: The following text is taken from the entry about the Order of Nine Angles in the Swedish version of Wikipedia [ http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Nine_Angles ] dated October 2010 CE. In our view it presents a reasonable overview of the ONA, some errors notwithstanding.

Order of Nine Angles, eller ONA, är en satanistisk organisation grundad i Storbritannien. Namnet ska inte läsas Angels (änglar), vilket ofta missuppfattas. Organisationen är initiatorisk och hemlig i den mån att dess medlemmar och medlemsantal inte offentliggjorts. ONA framstår ofta som en av de mer kontroversiella satanistiska grupperingarna, bland annat för att organisationen förespråkar människooffer. ONA tros ha existerat sedan 60-talet medan de själva hävdar att de har rötter till urgamla traditioner flera århundraden tillbaka. Organisationen har idag dragit sig tillbaka men påstås fortfarande existera

Tro

ONA förespråkar en individualistisk, teistisk satanism enligt Vänstra handens väg med mål att göra den individuella medlemmen till en gud, eller akausalt väsen, en ny ras kallad Homo Galacticus eller Homo Galactica. Detta ska åstadkommas genom att medlemmen ständigt strävar mot självförbättring såväl fysiskt, psykiskt som andligt genom olika övningar och aktiviteter som rekommenderades i organisationens skrifter. Organisationen förespråkar individualism till en sådan grad att generell uppfattning är att organisationens skrifter inte måste följas till punkt och pricka, individens utveckling är det primära målet. Sätt för sådan utveckling kan vara psykologiska processer, till exempel ‘insiktsroller’ för att empatisera med andra människor eller ärketyper, extremt krävande fysisk träning och magiskt arbete.

Organisationen erkänner andliga entiteters existens som i regel benämns som De mörka gudarna. ONA förespråkar att Vänstra handens väg och ONA:s väg är en mörk, syndig väg som inte ska underskattas. Flera av deras skrifter tar upp att ONA inte är för gemene man utan kräver dedikerat arbete och en väldigt stark vilja. Meningen är att genom evolution och naturligt urval skapa en ny mänsklig ras och civilisation. Somliga menar att detta är metaforiskt talat, andra hävdar att ONA är väldigt allvarliga genom förespråkandet av människooffer, opfer, och vissa tror att det handlar om en andlig utveckling. Ordagrant har Anton Long, författare bakom majoriteten av ONA:s skrifter uttryckt sig positivt till människooffren som en del i det naturliga urvalet och för att stärka gruppen, vilket också är allmän tolkning av ONA:s skrifter.

Dessa och flera andra av ONA:s läror har lett till en schism mellan dem och många andra grupperingar. ONA har uttryck ett förrakt gentemot den LaVey-satanistiska Church of Satan som i sin tur har fördömt ONA:s tro på människooffer och tro i allmänhet. Samma fördömande har gjorts av Temple of Set, med vilka ONA brevväxlade under 80-talet och diskuterade bland annat detta och deras skillnader och likheter.

Detta, tillsammans med ONA:s skrifter som av satanister och ockultister brukar bedömas som seriösa och väl utarbetade, de höga kraven för initiering samt hur länge organisationen existerat har gett den ett erkännande få andra satanistiska organisationer har som enbart presenterats på Internet.

ONAs organisation och historia

Order of Nine Angles påstås ha grundats under 60-talet som en sammanslagning av tre nypaganistiska tempel kallade Camlad, Temple of the Sun och The Noctulians. Det råder oklarhet i vem som är organisationens ansikte utåt eller språkrör, majoriteten av skrifterna är författade av Anton Long, enligt somliga en pseudonym använt av David Myatt. David Myatt påstås ha tagit över grupperingen sedan ledaren flyttat till Australien och vara mannen bakom identiteten Anton Long. Författaren Nick Ryan har lagt fram argument om att David Myatt spökskriver mycket för ONA och har bland annat pekat på David Myatts nationalsocialistiska samröre och influenser i ONAS litteratur som kan anses ha vissa likheter. ONA har tillbakavisat påståendena om att Anton Long och David Myatt är samma person, även om Myatt har antagits vara en medlem då han fört organisationens talan vid flera intervjuer.

Historiskt har ONA accepterat medlemmar genom att dessa tagit kontakt med organisationen genom en postadress. Huruvida de fortfarande gör det framgår inte då ONA har valt att dra sig tillbaka efter att ha, enligt egen utsago, slutfört sin uppgift att sprida sin lära offentligt, däremot har Anton Long publicerat mängder med texter under åren och nya manuskript och texter släpps så sent som hösten 2009. Självinitiering kan också ske av individen. Detta har lett till att människor påstått sig vara medlemmar av ONA eller sympatisera med ONA, framför allt på olika diskussionsforum på Internet. I och med organisationens hemlighet och avsaknad av en officiell hemsida eller talesman varken bekräftas eller dementeras några medlemmar, varför självinitierade medlemmar brukar anses tillhöra ONA som en lära eller till och med organisationen.

ONA har sympatiserande grupperingar eller mindre grupperingar som öppet påstår sig vara ONA-inriktade i USA, Kanada, Ryssland, Australien, Nya Zeeland samt flera länder i Europa. Man pratar om Nexions och sinister tribes, varav Temple of THEM och WSA 352 tillhör kanske de mest erkända av ONA själva.

Gradering

Inom organisationen existerar flera grader, varje grad avslutas med en rit som för utövaren till nästa grad.

  • Neophyte – Ämnar att ge individen förståelse för läran och utvecklas psykologiskt och andligt. Detta är uppdelat i fyra steg: (1) Skaffa sig en del specificerade ONA-skrifter, (2) Genomgå en hemlig ritual (jakt), (3) Genomföra initieringsritualen, alternativt självinitieringsritualen samt (4) förstå och lära sig spela The Star Game / Stjärnspelet, ett egenutvecklat spel av ONA med psykologiska, astrologiska och andliga undertoner.
  • Initiate – När individen uppnått denna grad påbörjas det magiska arbetet som består av sju steg: (1) Påbörja hermetiskt magiskt arbete och utvecklas inom detta enligt ONA:s Sjufaldiga system (Septenary system), att följa upp detta arbete i en magi-dagbok samt studera och använda The Sinister Tarot, (2) Påbörja hermetiskt arbete för ett specifikt mål eller önskan, (3) Sätta ett väldigt krävande fysiskt mål, som exempel nämns minimum att gå drygt fem mil på mindre än sju timmar i terräng, (4) Söka upp och välja ut en person att använda som magisk medarbetare och sexpartner och introducera denne till satanism (ONA), initiera denne och genomgå magiskt arbete med denne, (5) få tag på och studera fler specificerade ONA-skrifter, (6) Ta sig an en Insiktsroll, en form av bedragande rollspel där initiaten tar till sig en ärketyp, natur, personlighet eller yrkeskategori som är närmast sin motsatta för att utvecklas, samt (7) Genomgå graderingsritual för Extern Adept.
  • Extern adept – Som Extern adept fortsätter man det magiska arbetet och vidgandet av läran för andra: (1) Organisera och upprätta ett magiskt tempel och/eller en satanistisk grupp sex till åtta månader, rekrytera medlemmar och initiera dem i gruppen samt regelbunder hålla ritualer, (2) Träna och genomföra ännu högre fysiska mål, även här nämns som minimiexmpel drygt fem mil i terräng under sju timmar, fast med ryggsäck om cirka femton kilo, (3) Genomgå gradens hemliga uppgift, (4) Studera aeonisk lära och magi enligt ONA och praktisera denna, (4) Studera och om möjligt praktisera esoteriskt mässande, (5) Studera de esoteriska traditionerna av traditionell satanism (enligt ONA) och lära ut dessa till templets/gruppens medlemmar, samt (8) Genomgå graderingsritualen för Intern Adept.
  • Intern adept – Graden Intern adept lämnar medlemmen till att fullfölja sitt öde, något den förväntas veta eller komma underfund med vid denna grad. Processen beskrivs som att ta åratal och ska leda till total självinsikt. Medlemmen ska utöka sin kunskapa och vara väl lärd inom de olika magiska arbetena.
  • Mästare/Mästarinna – Som mästare eller mästarinna förväntas medlemmen ta ett större ansvar för organisationen eller gruppen, bland annat genom: (1) Att guida passande individer till den Sjufaldiga vägen, (2) Praktisera aeonisk magi för att främja den mörka vägen, (3) Självständigt arbeta och skapa nya sätt för att öka medveten förståelse för, och främja möjligheten för akausala/mörka makter. Medlemmen förväntas också använda sitt magiska arbete, främst inom aeonisk magi, för att förändra och påverka samhället. Denna grad tar minst sju år.

Efter mästare/mästarinna kommer graden Grand Master/Grand Mistress, enligt ONA:s skrifter uppnår bara en eller två individer per århundrade denna gradering, varför den inte beskrivs i deras offentliga texter så ingående. I vissa skrifter refereras det också till ytterligare en gradering kallad Odödlig (Immortal), spekulationer finns som menar att detta är statusen som gud, målet med läran.

Skrifter

Bland ONA:s skrifter tillhör de mest kända The Black Book of Satan (ej att förväxla med LaVey-satanismens The Satanic Bible) och NAOS. En lång rad skrifter har författats av ONA och majoriteten av dem av Anton Long. En del skönlitterära verk som ska läsas som både skönlitterära, inspirerande och magiska, har också skrivits, vid namn The Deofel Quartet.